Your motion. Twenty-one opposed, grounded, persuadable minds. Parliamentary procedure, forced rebuttals, named conditions — one sealed verdict, in hours, not weeks.
The procedure, the room, and the sealed record — narrated. 01:23 · AI-PRODUCED FILM
A Moderator enforces the procedure. A Stenographer footnotes every claim and seals the record. You read the verdict at the depth you purchased.
The Moderator goes around the room. Every agent declares whether the question sits within its expertise, argues from its own perspective — hearing everything said before it — and declares a vote: Yes, No, or Conditional with the condition named. No voice is skipped. No voice dominates.
The Moderator selects representatives of each camp to answer specific opposing arguments head-on. Expertise declarations are on the record, so a persuader can't improvise outside their ground.
Before every ballot, an advocate for each side rises and makes the best bulleted case to the undecided, in the parliamentary form:
"Mr. Speaker, if you believe as I believe that … then you would vote IN FAVOR OF the current motion."
"Mr. Speaker, if you believe as I believe that … then you would vote OPPOSED TO the current motion."
Votes are tallied under stated rules. Conditional votes are recorded with their conditions — so when a motion fails, you learn exactly what would have carried it. Refinement rounds can draft an amended motion aimed at the stated conditions and re-ballot.
The Stenographer footnotes claims, grades their confidence, and seals the entire proceeding into a hash-chained record with integrity certificates. Every run is reproducible, auditable, and re-convenable — the identical room, tomorrow, against your revised message.
Classic crowd wisdom averages independent judgments. The Boardroom extracts the structure of the crowd's wisdom — the argument space, the fracture lines, the persuasion conditions — from a room where every position is argued as strongly as it can be, and where the people who will never agree with you are heard in full, on the record, before the vote.
Personas grounded in the strongest documented case for your motion. They stress-test your arguments by making them — and exposing which ones actually carry.
Motivated opponents with real grounds for doubt. Sycophancy — the known failure mode of asking one agreeable AI — is engineered out by putting them in the room.
The swing bloc. Their named conditions — stated in their own words — are the levers that move composite motions. This is where your messaging work happens.
The same 21-member climate panel, the same five questions, run five separate times — across two different AI systems, three runs fully blind. The internal dialog is fresh every run. The structure holds every run.
"Where the outcome genuinely is unstable, the record shows the distribution instead of papering over it. That honesty is itself a reliability feature."
| Question | Result across 5 runs | Verdict |
|---|
The coalition algebra doesn't just describe — it predicts. Before re-balloting a supply-side amendment ("no new fossil extraction permits"), the panel's own named conditions were used to register a written prediction: 11–12 Favor — McKibben and Thunberg return, Gates and Musk hold, Lovins stays lost.
We don't just tell you the vote. We tell you which word changes it — and then we prove it.
Modeled positions — not population samples. We map how the best-articulated arguments on Earth receive your motion, and what would move them. Inspect the full record →
Every tier reports aggregate vote totals without roll call — the deliberation's integrity doesn't depend on exposing individual reasoning. Deeper levels simply open more of the sealed record.
Sounding Board $9.99 |
Positioning $49.99 |
Full Record $499.99 |
Interactive Lab from $4,999.99 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panel | ≤13 archetypes | ≤21, finely tuned | ≤25, incl. reviewed public-figure composites | Custom, client-directed |
| Questions | 5 | 7 | 10 | Iterative |
| Executive summary + question list | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Aggregate vote totals — never roll-called | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| For/against messaging + coalition analysis | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Advocate closing statements | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Full roll call — who voted how & why | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Full transcript · persuasion moments · multi-run distributions | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Re-run, swap personas, A/B test messages | — | — | — | ✓ |
$10k+, weeks, groupthink, one loud voice, no replay. The Boardroom: hours, every voice heard in full on every question — and the identical room re-convened tomorrow to test your revised message, which no human panel can do faithfully.
Surveys tell you that 38% object. The Boardroom tells you why, along which fracture lines, and what named conditions would change their minds.
One agreeable voice with no adversarial structure. The Boardroom: motivated opponents, a moderator who enforces hearing before voting, and a stenographer who seals the record.